Trim Bureaucracy with a Scalpel not a Chainsaw

Efficiency Begins with the Functional Organization Chart

The workers who actually provide public services should never be required to justify their jobs. Their managers must.

Every agency and every department should be defined by what it is supposed to do, not by how many people it employs. The first step in achieving this is to create a functional organization chart that reflects the mission and actual functions of each unit within the government—not its structure, its payroll, or its hierarchy.

Once that functional organizational chart is established, areas of overlap, duplication, and inefficiency become immediately clear. Consolidation is not only possible—it becomes obvious. Every agency and department, at every level of government, must be defined by its mission and its function, not by its staffing.

Accountability and Responsibility

Once a proper functional organization chart is in place, accountability becomes enforceable. The people responsible for decisions can be identified and held to account.

Public service workers do what they’re told, using only the tools they are given.

It is not their job to fix management failure.

When services are not provided, the fault lies with leadership, not the front line workers. Success should be recognized and rewarded. Failure should have consequences, not for the staff doing the work, but for the managers giving the orders.

The Administrative State

The Congress and a succession of presidents starting with Franklin Delano Roosevelt have allowed federal administrative agencies to become a fourth branch of government, usurping the power of the Congress, the President, and the Judiciary.

Since World War II, whenever a political need arose, Congress responded by creating some new department or administrative agency, rather than reform, reorganize, or repurpose an existing one. This impulse has produced a sprawling, layered, and morbidly obese administrative state that duplicates itself at every level of government, from Washington to the smallest towns and villages.

The result is more management, more separation between decision-makers and service providers, and steadily declining efficiency.

DHS — A Faltering Step in the Right Direction

Recognizing the tragic intelligence and communications failures that allowed the 9/11 attacks to succeed, creation of the Department of Homeland Security was supposed to fix the problem. Instead, it became a collection of fiefdoms under one political roof.

Each agency retained its own legacy systems, management, and silos. Rather than streamline, it layered more bureaucracy on top of what already existed, without clarity, coordination, or accountability.

The American Intelligence Community

Eighteen separate agencies form the U.S. Intelligence Community. Some report to the Director of National Intelligence. Some do not. Each claims a unique mission. None will accept responsibility. None are held to account.

Despite decades of growth, coordination among these agencies remains fragile at best. The DNI was created to centralize and coordinate intelligence. But it was denied both the authority and the resources to succeed.

Coordination Without Clarity

The intelligence agencies claim to “coordinate” with each other. But coordination without clarity is just confusion by committee. Meetings are held. Reports are filed. But who is in charge? Who is responsible? The answer is always the same: someone else.

Intelligence failures, from 9/11 to foreign interference in elections, reveal not a lack of information but a lack of leadership. The warnings were there. The dots were on the board. But no one connected them. And if they did, no one took responsibility.

The structure of the intelligence community almost guarantees this outcome. Without clear lines of authority, no one can act decisively. And when mistakes happen, no one is held accountable. Bureaucratic silos protect the careers of the cautious, not the mission of the country.

Everyone Has Authority. No One Has Responsibility.

Every agency in the intelligence community has its own general counsel. Every agency claims its own legal authority. Every agency writes its own rules of engagement. But no agency takes responsibility when something goes wrong.

When accountability is spread thin, it disappears. Everyone defers to someone else’s regulations. Everyone waits for someone else to act. Oversight becomes theater. Responsibility becomes an illusion.

The result is a leadership vacuum: an elaborate structure of power without responsibility. That is not just a management nightmare. It is a constitutional problem.

Classification Is the Barrier to Accountability

Classification was designed to protect vital secrets from foreign enemies. Today, it conceals government mistakes from the American people. What began as a narrow exception to transparency has become its default replacement.

Mistakes are buried behind classification stamps. Misjudgments are hidden by redactions. Failures are excused through secrecy. In the name of national security, accountability is denied.

The cost is real. When journalists are silenced, whistleblowers punished, and courts excluded, the Constitution suffers. Classified information is no longer a shield against foreign threats. It is a sword against domestic scrutiny.

Structural Reform Is the Only Solution

The intelligence muddle cannot be fixed by redrawing org charts or shifting personnel from one agency to another. It cannot be reformed with speeches or executive orders. And it cannot be trusted to reform itself.

Reform must be structural. The system must be rebuilt from the ground up with clear lines of accountability, transparent oversight, and enforceable legal limits. That requires congressional action and public pressure, not just internal memos or executive orders.

National security is not a license for dysfunction. It demands clarity, coherence, and constitutional discipline. The American people deserve a system that works for them, not around them.

Retraining the Intelligence Bureaucracy

You cannot reform intelligence agencies with PowerPoint slides and HR workshops. You have to change the incentives, the metrics, and the mission. The bureaucracy must be retrained to think like a mission planner, not like a contractor filling out forms.

Every intelligence official must be judged by whether their work actually improves national security—not whether it complies with some legacy checklist. Performance reviews must measure strategic insight, timely judgment, and real-world results, not box-checking, jargon, or institutional paralysis.

Bureaucracies don’t change on their own. They change when leaders demand it and back it up with promotions, demotions, reassignments, and even reductions in force. Until that happens, the system will continue to reward caution, punish initiative, and confuse secrecy with strategy.

Oversight Has Failed

Oversight mechanisms exist in theory, but in practice, they are mere façades, structures built to reassure rather than reform. Inspectors General issue reports that are ignored. Congressional committees hold hearings that accomplish nothing. Internal review boards protect institutional interests. Layers of oversight have become tools of delay, deflection, and denial, not accountability.

The deeper problem is cultural. Bureaucracies do not fear oversight because they do not expect consequences. Failures are rationalized, not rectified. No one is held accountable because everyone is part of the same system. Reports gather dust, whistleblowers are punished, and institutional memory erases scandal as soon as the headlines fade.

Without credible enforcement, oversight is theater. Real reform will require external political, legal, and public pressure to pry open the black boxes of government and demand more than hollow gestures of compliance. Until then, the machinery of oversight will continue to grind away, producing nothing but paperwork and excuses.

Change Will Not Come from Within

Bureaucracies will not dismantle themselves. No agency has ever voluntarily surrendered power, eliminated its own programs, or reduced its budget. Every commission, task force, or internal review ends with a plea for more money, more authority, and more staff. Reform will never come from white papers or interagency working groups. It will not come from within the system because the system is designed to protect itself.

Real change will require political, legal, and civic pressure from the outside. It will take elected officials willing to close redundant offices, repeal obsolete mandates, and defund programs that fail. It will take lawsuits to expose misconduct, investigations to reveal waste, and public outrage to force action. Most of all, it will take citizens who refuse to accept a government that answers to itself instead of the people.

Creative Commons License: This webpage and its contents are released under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. You are free to share and adapt this material, provided you give appropriate credit and share any derivatives under the same license.