Without proof of what caused the disease, there is no product liability case. The Supreme Court’s decision in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell (2026 U.S. LEXIS 2721, 2026 LX 336645) has focused national attention on warning labels, federal regulation, and preemption. Those are important legal issues, but in product liability litigation involving slow-starting, late-onset diseases such […]
Litigation
Challenge the Conflict. Protect the United States.
July 17, 2026 | Litigation
The federal courts must determine whether the United States is being represented by conflict-free counsel. Every United States Attorney in the Department of Justice takes an oath to faithfully perform their duties as well as the standard federal oath of office (5 U.S.C. §3331) to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against […]
Who Will Defend the American Taxpayer?
July 16, 2026 | Litigation
Every claim against the United States Treasury deserves an independent conflict-free defense. The American adversary system of justice depends upon one fundamental principle. For the adversary system to function, every party to a lawsuit must be represented by an advocate whose undivided loyalty is owed to that party alone. When the United States is sued […]
Before There Can Be a Product Liability Case, There Must Be Causation
July 7, 2026 | Litigation, Policy Analysis
Without proof of what caused the disease, there is no product liability case. The Supreme Court’s decision in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell (2026 U.S. LEXIS 2721, 2026 LX 336645) has focused national attention on warning labels, federal regulation, and preemption. Those are important legal issues, but in product liability litigation involving slow-starting, late-onset diseases such […]